|
|
|
 |
| 
River
Road Church, Baptist
Dr.
Cecil E. Sherman
June
27, 2003
“The
Price of Telling the Truth”
Mark
6:14-29
The
story of the dying of John the Baptist is a sorry tale. Bad people
put good people in prison and then in the most unlikely arrangement,
it becomes an opportunity for John the Baptist to be killed.
It
all begins when people are wondering who Jesus is. Who is this
fellow beginning to make a name for himself and people beginning
to talk about him? His disciples go out, do wonderful things,
people come back, who is he? How do you explain this man? One
of the explanations was, he is John the Baptist come back to life.
This idea particularly appealed to the man who was called king
over Galilee and Perea, a small district of what we would call Palestine.
Interesting fellow; comes from a family that’s more interesting
still, until this day books are written about the Herod Clan.
One of them came out a few years ago; most entangled, conflictive,
murderous, bunch of thugs you ever saw. Herod the Great built
the temple that was present in Jesus time. Any time anybody threatened
him, he had them killed, including several of his children, causing
the Jews to say you have a better chance of living if you’re Herod’s
pig than you do if you’re Herod’s son. We’re talking about pretty
rough people.
This
story has some interesting people in it and it’s about truth telling.
Herod Antipas, son of Herod the Great, king over this small district,
had the job for 43 years. We’re not talking about a short term,
and he had a half brother that lived in Rome, named Herod Philip.
On occasion, Herod Antipas goes to Rome, visits this fellow, is
smitten by his wife, there comes an affair, and then he persuades
her to leave Herod Philip and go with him back to Galilee and live
with him as his wife. It was this that caused John the Baptist
to speak up and say, “It is not lawful for you to have your brother’s
wife.” Now, specifically, Leviticus 18:16 reads, “You shall not
uncover the nakedness of your brother’s wife. It is your brother’s
nakedness.” For this, the king put John the Baptist in prison.
Most people hold that the prison was Machaerus, a fortress some
five, six miles east of the Dead Sea, in truly a God-forsaken place.
You go to the Holy Land today, you go down to Masada from Jerusalem,
they will point to the east, there are the ruins of Machaerus; a
place where Herod wintered and where John the Baptist was killed.
Now
the second character in this is Herodias, first Philip’s wife and
now Herod Antipas’ wife. When John said her union to Herod Antipas
was a sinful thing, Herodias did not feel shame, she said in affect,
“How dare you!” She was not ashamed, she was angry. So the test
says, “Herodias had a grudge against him.” Meaning John the Baptist.
Sounds like a soap opera doesn’t it? And she was waiting for
her chance to get at John the Baptist. Now she had it not in her
power to kill him, but she had persuaded her husband to lock him
up. Interestingly, her husband found John the Baptist fascinating
and from time to time would bring him out of his chains and have
him speak to him. And it toyed with a little flame in Herod Antipas’
conscience and he was all at once disturbed and fascinated by it.
So, when people were trying to figure out who Jesus is, Herod
Antipas, who had ordered John killed, probably in his guilt, reasoned
that Jesus might be John the Baptist reincarnated.
Salome
was Herodias’s daughter by an earlier marriage. Her dance was
out of character for a king’s daughter, it should have been performed
by a prostitute. So get the picture; the king had a birthday party,
courtiers and officers invited, wine flows freely, and a girl is
called upon to dance. She must have put on quite a show. The
king was expansive. The king said, “Anything you want.” She
didn’t answer. She went to talk to her mother and Salome asked
Herodias, “What shall I ask?” She said, “For the head of John
the Baptist on a platter.” Now folks that put a chill on any party.
And it happened as she asked. She had a grudge, she got a chance,
and she took it. John the Baptist is dead.
What
he did was intemperate and true.
We
live in an age of spin-doctors. We wonder if we’re told the truth
by media, politicians. We have reason to wonder. So we have
become skeptical, a bit cynical about truth. We have a hard time
with it. When you hear a story like this, you realize this isn’t
new. Stuff like this has been happening for a long time. Now,
if I were speaking to a class of preachers, I might ask at this
point, what have you learned from John the Baptist’s experience?
You see, you’re conflicted too. All at once you want the references
on our future pastor to tell the truth, but you don’t want the pastor
who comes to be too rough about what he says. So we want it straight
over here, but we want it smooth over there. Tricky business isn’t
it? That happened a long time ago.
Let
me tell you a story that happened a while ago, but compared to John
the Baptist is quite recent. Once there was a man named William
Whitsett. Born in Tennessee, went to Union College, Jackson, Tennessee,
then became a scout, then a chaplain in the Confederate Army, survives
that war, comes to the University of Virginia, gets a degree in
History, goes to Southern Seminary, finishes, goes to Leipzig first,
then Berlin, and studies further; his field is Church History.
He goes back to Georgia, becomes pastor of First Baptist Church,
Albany and in 1872, he becomes a Church History teacher at Southern
Seminary just about the time it moved to Louisville. He taught
there from 1872 to 1895 when he was made president of the school.
But about that time, some people began to scratch around in the
things that Whitsey had written and found that in 1885, ten years
previous, he had written an article that says, ‘there is no historical
evidence that the River Road Church Baptist came straight in unbroken
succession from the First Baptist Church of Jerusalem.’ This came
as a shock. You mean we don’t go back and back and back and they’re
Baptist and Baptist and Baptist and Baptist and Baptist? No.
He said the historical evidence says early in the 17 th century,
out of the English-Puritan movement, there came a group called Baptists
and prior to that, there is no record of anybody doing baptism as
we do, much less wearing the name that we wear. The editor of
the Western Recorder, a Baptist paper in Kentucky, Baptist and Reflector,
a Baptist paper in Tennessee, and Texas Baptist Standard, they crawled
all over Whitsett. They put so much pressure on the trustees of
Southern, until in 1899, four years after he took the job, he was
forced to resign. He comes to the University of Richmond, teaches
Philosophy and Religion until he dies in 1911. This is immediately
close to this church, because our former pastor is now reading the
diaries of William Whitsett. Whitsett requested that they be closed
for 100 years and slowly, each year is uncovering and Jim is working
that and probably will come out with a book and we fund it.
Why
did he get fired? Actually, he was forced to resign for telling
the truth. Telling the truth can shorten your career with John
the Baptist, with William Whitsey; telling the truth is priceless.
What’s a part of all this? What does the text tell us? The
three quick ideas I want you to hear, number one John had a standard,
he had a measure for truth, it is not lawful. Truth wasn’t just
whatever he wanted it to be, he had something that normalized truth,
and it was more than a subjective opinion of John. Fundamentalism
has made it difficult for us to work scripture as John worked it.
Fundamentalism has made almost a joke of scripture in some places.
But the risk we run is subjectivism. The pressures of culture
come to bear on the way we interpret any standard for truth. We
need to be careful. Too much rigidity and you miss the mark altogether
and in your desire to do truth, you become a Pharisee, a caricature
of truth doing. On the other hand, you give away standard altogether.
Truth has to a point of reference.
The
second observation; it takes courage to say the truth. Truth apart
from courage is silence. Lots of people have had the sense to
figure out the truth, not nearly as many have had the courage to
do it, or say it. There’s a person who’s got the nerve to tell
the truth! Now, lots of times truth telling does not take nerve,
but the times that are memorable, it does and when that happens,
too many gets nerves, not nerve. John had an awful lot of courage.
Third
observation; John refused the rationalizations that would compromise
truth. He knew it was not good for his health to criticize the
sex life of a king. I suspect that he had all the good sense that
any of you has. Watch your step! You know you’re getting close
to the edge. Discretion is the better part of valor. Mind your
manners. He who fights and runs away lives to fight another day.
Actually, he who fights and runs away comes nearer learning how
to run than learning how to fight.
I
had a student in the class Daniel Bagby and I just finished, who’s
wrestling with a difficult, ethical issue in his small church in
south side Virginia. This is the first time this person has ever
been really called upon to speak to culture and speak a word of
judgment. And the class turned and turned and turned. If you
duck on this one, does this become a pattern for the next time and
the next time? Do you back off, shave truth, or just leave it
unspoken? Now, truth telling requires a good bit of resistance
to the rationalizations that talk you out of being forthright.
We live in a society that manages news, elevates style over truth,
and thinks its not good manners to be straightforward. In the
scripture, in the book of Hebrews, God is described as the God who
cannot laugh. If worship makes you more like the God you worship,
the affect of worship ought to be an ascending capacity to truth
and an enormous resistance to laugh. Jesus said, let your conversation
be simply yes, no. You don’t have to say, so help me God, just,
you’re not any more truthful on a witness stand in a court than
you are in conversation in the parking lot. You simply come to
tell the truth. Now, I didn’t say anything any of you didn’t know.
But the reason you come to church, is to get little breaks to
go ahead and do what you know is right. We need to be truth tellers
and if there’s a price, well there’s always been a price. Let
us be known as people who tell the truth.
Now,
a “bracket” in closing; truth can be brutal and misused. I have
not pursued that idea. Of course I’m not going in that direction,
but that’s not where our witness lies. This is to our aid; it
is not to make our communication rough or uncaring.
CES;
Lisa King, mt
|
 |