|

Vol. III, # 21, Dec. 31, 2004
Tonight the sixth annual SSBSC New Year's Eve Social
will begin at 9 PM and last until 2005 arrives. The social will
be at Brenda and PH's home at 301 Westham Pkwy, only a half mile
from RRCB in the northerly direction. Turn off River Road going
north on Westham
Pkwy and go one-half mile to the corner of Lakewood Drive and Westham
Pkwy on the right. There will be some food and drink. In addition
the annual SSBSC trivia quiz will be available, a five hundred piece
jigsaw puzzle of a Monet painting will be offered and an opportunity
to see Tonto the Tarantula will be permitted upon request. PH has
been told by jigsaw puzzle experts that a five hundred piece puzzle
is doable within three hours. Will partying Shepsons meet the challenge?
For those who will be unable to attend this social the 2004 SSBSC
Trivia Quiz will be sent out via E-mail on January 1, 2005.
PH has already heard from a few Shepsons who will
be attending the Social. Shepson Doris Curtis wrote the following:
"Barring unforeseen events, e.g., we fall
asleep during the evening news and forget to wake up in time for
the party, we will be there and will bring some pick-up food &
beverage. But, truth be told, the following promise is the real
reason we don't want to miss it:"
"Also Tonto the tarantula can be viewed upon
request."
Shepson Terry Marsh called PH and indicated that
he and Sheila might be a little late and that he might already be
"ripped" before arriving.
If any of you have no other commitment of time tonight
and would like good company to welcome in the new year, come and
join us.
Remember in your prayers: Jackie Everett, infants
Loyal Clark Davis and Paige Elizabeth Newcomb and their respective
mothers, Rob
Brown, the VCU BSU, Ellen Gwathmey and her father, Shoney's employee
Vivian Martin and her husband Ray, Roger Beck, Cecil and Dot Sherman,
Peggy Harris and her family, Kim Williams and her family, Rick and
Linda Mears, Donald and Barbara Deer, Audrey Thomson's sister Sharon
Ruben and Sharon's family, Jared Oliver, Julia Tyler and her parents,
Mary and Julian Pentecost, Kay and Bob Culpepper, John and Margaret
Oliver, the Church clergy and staff, our military and civilians
in harm's way, those in peril in Asia and those only known to you.
January
20, Thursday evening, Caritas, SSBSC hosting. Needed are seven to
eight Shepsons to prepare and serve the dinner and two male Shepsons
to spend the night. The tentative menu is George Davis meat loaf.
Questions should be directed to SSBSC missionaries Charlotte and
Bill at 285-3185
February 9, Ash Wednesday - Will there be real
ashes this year?
March 20, Palm Sunday and the first day of Spring
March 27 Easter Sunday
We are now in the midst of the fifteenth chapter
of I Samuel and Teacher Bob has announced that David will soon make
his appearance.
Maybe the sixteenth chapter will introduce David, the youngest of
the eight sons of Jesse. We will learn that David is the least likely
to be anointed as king among Jesse's sons and that he is a young
lad with sparkling eyes who is out in the field caring for the sheep.
Initially when Samuel arrives to anoint the new king, he assumes
that one of Jesse's older sons, Eliab, would be the likely choice
because he was a tall man. However, the Lord said to him, "Pay
no attention to how tall and handsome he is. I have rejected him,
because I do not judge as people judge. They look at the outward
appearance, but I look at the heart."
We will soon be learning about one of the most
heroic, courageous, womanizing, conflicted and important people
of the Bible. Out of the House of David comes Jesus. twenty-eight
generations later. One would assume that God perceived that David
had the "heart" to be a great king of Israel.
PH
is pleased as punch to announce that Sandra and Carl Sizemore did
just that thirty-eight years ago. Also in early January three Shepson
births occurred. Donna Brown and Kitty Davis were born twenty-nine
years ago this Sunday and Judy Morris was born twenty-nine years
ago this coming Tuesday.
In the gospel of Matthew, chapter 2, verses 16 through
18 the account of what we know as "the slaughter of the innocents"
is described. Did this really happen? Some Biblical scholars believe
that this slaughter is unhistorical. For example, Josephus wrote
about many of King Herod's evil acts, but makes no mention of the
slaughter of innocent little boys in Bethlehem and the surrounding
vicinity. A summary of what Josephus recorded is this:
Historically, Herod, to put it mildly, did not
have a peaceful reign. His many sons and wives were involved in
bitter rivalry for his throne. Herod was not a man to hold family
relation sacred. He had three of his sons executed for conspiracy.
He executed his brother-in-law, Joseph. At the urging of Joseph's
widow, Salome, he murdered his own wife, Mariamme. If he treated
his own family badly, his opponents and enemies were given even
more ferocious handling. He murdered the Jewish High Priest, Aristobolus
III and forty-five members of the Sanhedrin for their support
of the Hasmoneans. These are just samplings of Herod's atrocities.
He was therefore a kind of man that could have committed the crime
Matthew attributed to him.
The atrocities listed above are taken from Josephus'
Antiquities of the Jews. From Josephus' own writings, we can tell
that he hated
Herod, for he obviously took pleasure in noting down every crime
and atrocities that was attributed to the Idumean king. Many of
the crimes described by Josephus were far less "wicked"
than the slaughter of the innocents described by Matthew. Now
Josephus' list was very detailed. Had the slaughter actually occurred
it would have been an event well known enough for the Jewish historian
to have heard of it. Yet the silence of Josephus and the absence
of any reference to it in any contemporary secular writings (Jewish,
Greek or Roman) cannot be explained if the event was historical.
The conclusion forces itself on us, it never happened.
Was this episode a work of theological fiction,
based on the story of Moses in Exodus, composed either by Matthew
himself or the early Christian tradition to fulfill what was thought
to be an Old Testament prophecy about the messiah?
PH: Only Matthew writes about this slaughter in
his account of the early life of Jesus. Luke writes that Joseph,
Mary and Jesus simply returned to Nazareth after taking Jesus to
the temple for purification. Luke also wrote in considerable detail
about Simeon and Anna, but he made no mention of the slaughter of
the innocents. As so much in the four gospels we are left to decide
for ourselves in regard to what is historical and what is traditional
or is it simply based on faith? Herod certainly seemed ruthless
enough to have ordered this slaughter. But if one thinks about it
in an individual and personal way, who would have obeyed the order?
The Roman soldiers would have not been subject to the order and
would the Jewish authorities have done such an ungodly act? Likely
a lot of children would have been hidden. For those of you who might
be interested those liberal and zany guys and gals in the Jesus
Seminar believe this slaughter to be fiction. The four gospels agree
on the Cross and on the Resurrection. Those events clearly seem
to be the basis for the faith of the early apostles and the establishment
of the church.
Some of the information regarding this little thought
provoking comment was found at:
http://www.geocities.com/paulntobin/herod.html#josephus
Who would really know whether Joseph, Mary and
Jesus went to Egypt? PH thinks the donkey would know. Does the attached
donkey know?
PH



December
24, 2004
December
17, 2004
December
10, 2004
December
3, 2004
November
26, 2004
November
19, 2004
November
12, 2004
November
5, 2004
October
29, 2004
October
22, 2004
October
15, 2004
October
8, 2004
October
1, 2004
September
24, 2004
September
17, 2004
September
10, 2004
September
3, 2004
August
27, 2004
August
20, 2004
August
13, 2004
August
6, 2004
July
23, 2004
July
16, 2004
June
25, 2004
June
18, 2004
June
4, 2004
May
14, 2004
May
7, 2004
April
30, 2004
April
23, 2004
April
16, 2004
April
9, 2004
April
2, 2004
March
26, 2004
March
19, 2004
March
12, 2004
March
5, 2004
February
27, 2004
February
20, 2004
February
13, 2004
February
6, 2004
January
30, 2004
January
23, 2004
January 16, 2004
January
9, 2004
January
2, 2004
2003
Archive
2002
Archive
|